Justice Nicholas clarified that while the repayment of a digital asset does not constitute a deferred debt, the extension of margin in national currency does, thereby categorizing the product as a credit facility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In response to the ruling, a Kraken spokesperson expressed disappointment but emphasized the company's commitment to compliance. \"We're prepared and willing to comply with the court's decision,\"<\/em> the spokesperson said. They also highlighted the complexity of applying traditional regulatory frameworks to emerging technologies, acknowledging the court's recognition of these challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Following the ruling, ASIC announced that the two parties had seven days to agree on declarations and injunctions. Additionally, ASIC intends to seek financial penalties against Bit Trade, further highlighting the regulatory challenges that global crypto firms face as they navigate differing legal landscapes.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Kraken's Australian Arm Found In Breach Of Financial Regulations, Court Rules","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"krakens-australian-arm-found-in-breach-of-financial-regulations-court-rules","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-26 00:58:58","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18361","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"total_page":false},"paged":1,"class":"jblog_block_13"};
Justice Nicholas clarified that while the repayment of a digital asset does not constitute a deferred debt, the extension of margin in national currency does, thereby categorizing the product as a credit facility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In response to the ruling, a Kraken spokesperson expressed disappointment but emphasized the company's commitment to compliance. \"We're prepared and willing to comply with the court's decision,\"<\/em> the spokesperson said. They also highlighted the complexity of applying traditional regulatory frameworks to emerging technologies, acknowledging the court's recognition of these challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Following the ruling, ASIC announced that the two parties had seven days to agree on declarations and injunctions. Additionally, ASIC intends to seek financial penalties against Bit Trade, further highlighting the regulatory challenges that global crypto firms face as they navigate differing legal landscapes.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Kraken's Australian Arm Found In Breach Of Financial Regulations, Court Rules","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"krakens-australian-arm-found-in-breach-of-financial-regulations-court-rules","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-26 00:58:58","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18361","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"total_page":false},"paged":1,"class":"jblog_block_13"};
See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Kraken Exchange Opens Waitlist For An Upcoming NFT Platform<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Justice Nicholas clarified that while the repayment of a digital asset does not constitute a deferred debt, the extension of margin in national currency does, thereby categorizing the product as a credit facility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In response to the ruling, a Kraken spokesperson expressed disappointment but emphasized the company's commitment to compliance. \"We're prepared and willing to comply with the court's decision,\"<\/em> the spokesperson said. They also highlighted the complexity of applying traditional regulatory frameworks to emerging technologies, acknowledging the court's recognition of these challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Following the ruling, ASIC announced that the two parties had seven days to agree on declarations and injunctions. Additionally, ASIC intends to seek financial penalties against Bit Trade, further highlighting the regulatory challenges that global crypto firms face as they navigate differing legal landscapes.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Kraken's Australian Arm Found In Breach Of Financial Regulations, Court Rules","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"krakens-australian-arm-found-in-breach-of-financial-regulations-court-rules","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-26 00:58:58","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18361","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"total_page":false},"paged":1,"class":"jblog_block_13"};
According to ASIC, Bit Trade's margin extension product has been available on the Kraken exchange since October 2021 without the legally required target market determination. The court found that this oversight placed Bit Trade in direct contravention of the Corporations Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Kraken Exchange Opens Waitlist For An Upcoming NFT Platform<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Justice Nicholas clarified that while the repayment of a digital asset does not constitute a deferred debt, the extension of margin in national currency does, thereby categorizing the product as a credit facility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In response to the ruling, a Kraken spokesperson expressed disappointment but emphasized the company's commitment to compliance. \"We're prepared and willing to comply with the court's decision,\"<\/em> the spokesperson said. They also highlighted the complexity of applying traditional regulatory frameworks to emerging technologies, acknowledging the court's recognition of these challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Following the ruling, ASIC announced that the two parties had seven days to agree on declarations and injunctions. Additionally, ASIC intends to seek financial penalties against Bit Trade, further highlighting the regulatory challenges that global crypto firms face as they navigate differing legal landscapes.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Kraken's Australian Arm Found In Breach Of Financial Regulations, Court Rules","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"krakens-australian-arm-found-in-breach-of-financial-regulations-court-rules","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-26 00:58:58","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18361","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"total_page":false},"paged":1,"class":"jblog_block_13"};
This ruling<\/a>, which marks a notable victory for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), underscores the growing scrutiny faced by cryptocurrency exchanges in the country. Justice Nicholas determined that Bit Trade breached Section 994B of the Corporations Act, which mandates that financial product issuers must assess and define the target market for their offerings before they reach consumers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to ASIC, Bit Trade's margin extension product has been available on the Kraken exchange since October 2021 without the legally required target market determination. The court found that this oversight placed Bit Trade in direct contravention of the Corporations Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Kraken Exchange Opens Waitlist For An Upcoming NFT Platform<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Justice Nicholas clarified that while the repayment of a digital asset does not constitute a deferred debt, the extension of margin in national currency does, thereby categorizing the product as a credit facility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In response to the ruling, a Kraken spokesperson expressed disappointment but emphasized the company's commitment to compliance. \"We're prepared and willing to comply with the court's decision,\"<\/em> the spokesperson said. They also highlighted the complexity of applying traditional regulatory frameworks to emerging technologies, acknowledging the court's recognition of these challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Following the ruling, ASIC announced that the two parties had seven days to agree on declarations and injunctions. Additionally, ASIC intends to seek financial penalties against Bit Trade, further highlighting the regulatory challenges that global crypto firms face as they navigate differing legal landscapes.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Kraken's Australian Arm Found In Breach Of Financial Regulations, Court Rules","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"krakens-australian-arm-found-in-breach-of-financial-regulations-court-rules","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-26 00:58:58","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18361","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"total_page":false},"paged":1,"class":"jblog_block_13"};
A recent ruling by the Federal Court of Australia has brought to light significant compliance issues surrounding Kraken's operations in the country, Coindesk reported. Bit Trade Pty Ltd, Kraken's local operator, was found to have violated Australian financial regulations by offering a margin extension product to retail clients without conducting a required target market determination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This ruling<\/a>, which marks a notable victory for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), underscores the growing scrutiny faced by cryptocurrency exchanges in the country. Justice Nicholas determined that Bit Trade breached Section 994B of the Corporations Act, which mandates that financial product issuers must assess and define the target market for their offerings before they reach consumers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to ASIC, Bit Trade's margin extension product has been available on the Kraken exchange since October 2021 without the legally required target market determination. The court found that this oversight placed Bit Trade in direct contravention of the Corporations Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Kraken Exchange Opens Waitlist For An Upcoming NFT Platform<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Justice Nicholas clarified that while the repayment of a digital asset does not constitute a deferred debt, the extension of margin in national currency does, thereby categorizing the product as a credit facility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In response to the ruling, a Kraken spokesperson expressed disappointment but emphasized the company's commitment to compliance. \"We're prepared and willing to comply with the court's decision,\"<\/em> the spokesperson said. They also highlighted the complexity of applying traditional regulatory frameworks to emerging technologies, acknowledging the court's recognition of these challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Following the ruling, ASIC announced that the two parties had seven days to agree on declarations and injunctions. Additionally, ASIC intends to seek financial penalties against Bit Trade, further highlighting the regulatory challenges that global crypto firms face as they navigate differing legal landscapes.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Kraken's Australian Arm Found In Breach Of Financial Regulations, Court Rules","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"krakens-australian-arm-found-in-breach-of-financial-regulations-court-rules","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-26 00:58:58","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18361","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"total_page":false},"paged":1,"class":"jblog_block_13"};
A recent ruling by the Federal Court of Australia has brought to light significant compliance issues surrounding Kraken's operations in the country, Coindesk reported. Bit Trade Pty Ltd, Kraken's local operator, was found to have violated Australian financial regulations by offering a margin extension product to retail clients without conducting a required target market determination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This ruling<\/a>, which marks a notable victory for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), underscores the growing scrutiny faced by cryptocurrency exchanges in the country. Justice Nicholas determined that Bit Trade breached Section 994B of the Corporations Act, which mandates that financial product issuers must assess and define the target market for their offerings before they reach consumers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to ASIC, Bit Trade's margin extension product has been available on the Kraken exchange since October 2021 without the legally required target market determination. The court found that this oversight placed Bit Trade in direct contravention of the Corporations Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Kraken Exchange Opens Waitlist For An Upcoming NFT Platform<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Justice Nicholas clarified that while the repayment of a digital asset does not constitute a deferred debt, the extension of margin in national currency does, thereby categorizing the product as a credit facility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In response to the ruling, a Kraken spokesperson expressed disappointment but emphasized the company's commitment to compliance. \"We're prepared and willing to comply with the court's decision,\"<\/em> the spokesperson said. They also highlighted the complexity of applying traditional regulatory frameworks to emerging technologies, acknowledging the court's recognition of these challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Following the ruling, ASIC announced that the two parties had seven days to agree on declarations and injunctions. Additionally, ASIC intends to seek financial penalties against Bit Trade, further highlighting the regulatory challenges that global crypto firms face as they navigate differing legal landscapes.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Kraken's Australian Arm Found In Breach Of Financial Regulations, Court Rules","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"krakens-australian-arm-found-in-breach-of-financial-regulations-court-rules","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-26 00:58:58","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18361","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"total_page":false},"paged":1,"class":"jblog_block_13"};
A recent ruling by the Federal Court of Australia has brought to light significant compliance issues surrounding Kraken's operations in the country, Coindesk reported. Bit Trade Pty Ltd, Kraken's local operator, was found to have violated Australian financial regulations by offering a margin extension product to retail clients without conducting a required target market determination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This ruling<\/a>, which marks a notable victory for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), underscores the growing scrutiny faced by cryptocurrency exchanges in the country. Justice Nicholas determined that Bit Trade breached Section 994B of the Corporations Act, which mandates that financial product issuers must assess and define the target market for their offerings before they reach consumers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to ASIC, Bit Trade's margin extension product has been available on the Kraken exchange since October 2021 without the legally required target market determination. The court found that this oversight placed Bit Trade in direct contravention of the Corporations Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Kraken Exchange Opens Waitlist For An Upcoming NFT Platform<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Justice Nicholas clarified that while the repayment of a digital asset does not constitute a deferred debt, the extension of margin in national currency does, thereby categorizing the product as a credit facility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In response to the ruling, a Kraken spokesperson expressed disappointment but emphasized the company's commitment to compliance. \"We're prepared and willing to comply with the court's decision,\"<\/em> the spokesperson said. They also highlighted the complexity of applying traditional regulatory frameworks to emerging technologies, acknowledging the court's recognition of these challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Following the ruling, ASIC announced that the two parties had seven days to agree on declarations and injunctions. Additionally, ASIC intends to seek financial penalties against Bit Trade, further highlighting the regulatory challenges that global crypto firms face as they navigate differing legal landscapes.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Kraken's Australian Arm Found In Breach Of Financial Regulations, Court Rules","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"krakens-australian-arm-found-in-breach-of-financial-regulations-court-rules","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-26 00:58:58","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18361","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"total_page":false},"paged":1,"class":"jblog_block_13"};
A recent ruling by the Federal Court of Australia has brought to light significant compliance issues surrounding Kraken's operations in the country, Coindesk reported. Bit Trade Pty Ltd, Kraken's local operator, was found to have violated Australian financial regulations by offering a margin extension product to retail clients without conducting a required target market determination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This ruling<\/a>, which marks a notable victory for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), underscores the growing scrutiny faced by cryptocurrency exchanges in the country. Justice Nicholas determined that Bit Trade breached Section 994B of the Corporations Act, which mandates that financial product issuers must assess and define the target market for their offerings before they reach consumers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to ASIC, Bit Trade's margin extension product has been available on the Kraken exchange since October 2021 without the legally required target market determination. The court found that this oversight placed Bit Trade in direct contravention of the Corporations Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Kraken Exchange Opens Waitlist For An Upcoming NFT Platform<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Justice Nicholas clarified that while the repayment of a digital asset does not constitute a deferred debt, the extension of margin in national currency does, thereby categorizing the product as a credit facility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In response to the ruling, a Kraken spokesperson expressed disappointment but emphasized the company's commitment to compliance. \"We're prepared and willing to comply with the court's decision,\"<\/em> the spokesperson said. They also highlighted the complexity of applying traditional regulatory frameworks to emerging technologies, acknowledging the court's recognition of these challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Following the ruling, ASIC announced that the two parties had seven days to agree on declarations and injunctions. Additionally, ASIC intends to seek financial penalties against Bit Trade, further highlighting the regulatory challenges that global crypto firms face as they navigate differing legal landscapes.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Kraken's Australian Arm Found In Breach Of Financial Regulations, Court Rules","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"krakens-australian-arm-found-in-breach-of-financial-regulations-court-rules","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-26 00:58:58","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18361","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"total_page":false},"paged":1,"class":"jblog_block_13"};
HashKey and OSL are the only firms with full licenses in Hong Kong, while OKX and ByBit are among 12 firms that have withdrawn their applications following SFC inspections.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Hong Kong Regulator Flags Up To 11 Crypto Firms Seeking A Full Licence","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"hong-kong-regulator-flags-up-to-11-crypto-firms-seeking-a-full-licence","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-28 23:32:21","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-28 13:32:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18388","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":18361,"post_author":"1","post_date":"2024-08-26 00:58:52","post_date_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:52","post_content":"\n A recent ruling by the Federal Court of Australia has brought to light significant compliance issues surrounding Kraken's operations in the country, Coindesk reported. Bit Trade Pty Ltd, Kraken's local operator, was found to have violated Australian financial regulations by offering a margin extension product to retail clients without conducting a required target market determination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This ruling<\/a>, which marks a notable victory for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), underscores the growing scrutiny faced by cryptocurrency exchanges in the country. Justice Nicholas determined that Bit Trade breached Section 994B of the Corporations Act, which mandates that financial product issuers must assess and define the target market for their offerings before they reach consumers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to ASIC, Bit Trade's margin extension product has been available on the Kraken exchange since October 2021 without the legally required target market determination. The court found that this oversight placed Bit Trade in direct contravention of the Corporations Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Kraken Exchange Opens Waitlist For An Upcoming NFT Platform<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Justice Nicholas clarified that while the repayment of a digital asset does not constitute a deferred debt, the extension of margin in national currency does, thereby categorizing the product as a credit facility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In response to the ruling, a Kraken spokesperson expressed disappointment but emphasized the company's commitment to compliance. \"We're prepared and willing to comply with the court's decision,\"<\/em> the spokesperson said. They also highlighted the complexity of applying traditional regulatory frameworks to emerging technologies, acknowledging the court's recognition of these challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Following the ruling, ASIC announced that the two parties had seven days to agree on declarations and injunctions. Additionally, ASIC intends to seek financial penalties against Bit Trade, further highlighting the regulatory challenges that global crypto firms face as they navigate differing legal landscapes.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Kraken's Australian Arm Found In Breach Of Financial Regulations, Court Rules","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"krakens-australian-arm-found-in-breach-of-financial-regulations-court-rules","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-26 00:58:58","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18361","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"total_page":false},"paged":1,"class":"jblog_block_13"};
Hong Kong criminalized crypto firms operating unlicensed virtual asset trading platforms on June 1. SFC said it would pursue firms violating the regulation.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n HashKey and OSL are the only firms with full licenses in Hong Kong, while OKX and ByBit are among 12 firms that have withdrawn their applications following SFC inspections.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Hong Kong Regulator Flags Up To 11 Crypto Firms Seeking A Full Licence","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"hong-kong-regulator-flags-up-to-11-crypto-firms-seeking-a-full-licence","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-28 23:32:21","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-28 13:32:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18388","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":18361,"post_author":"1","post_date":"2024-08-26 00:58:52","post_date_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:52","post_content":"\n A recent ruling by the Federal Court of Australia has brought to light significant compliance issues surrounding Kraken's operations in the country, Coindesk reported. Bit Trade Pty Ltd, Kraken's local operator, was found to have violated Australian financial regulations by offering a margin extension product to retail clients without conducting a required target market determination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This ruling<\/a>, which marks a notable victory for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), underscores the growing scrutiny faced by cryptocurrency exchanges in the country. Justice Nicholas determined that Bit Trade breached Section 994B of the Corporations Act, which mandates that financial product issuers must assess and define the target market for their offerings before they reach consumers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to ASIC, Bit Trade's margin extension product has been available on the Kraken exchange since October 2021 without the legally required target market determination. The court found that this oversight placed Bit Trade in direct contravention of the Corporations Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Kraken Exchange Opens Waitlist For An Upcoming NFT Platform<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Justice Nicholas clarified that while the repayment of a digital asset does not constitute a deferred debt, the extension of margin in national currency does, thereby categorizing the product as a credit facility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In response to the ruling, a Kraken spokesperson expressed disappointment but emphasized the company's commitment to compliance. \"We're prepared and willing to comply with the court's decision,\"<\/em> the spokesperson said. They also highlighted the complexity of applying traditional regulatory frameworks to emerging technologies, acknowledging the court's recognition of these challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Following the ruling, ASIC announced that the two parties had seven days to agree on declarations and injunctions. Additionally, ASIC intends to seek financial penalties against Bit Trade, further highlighting the regulatory challenges that global crypto firms face as they navigate differing legal landscapes.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Kraken's Australian Arm Found In Breach Of Financial Regulations, Court Rules","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"krakens-australian-arm-found-in-breach-of-financial-regulations-court-rules","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-26 00:58:58","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18361","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"total_page":false},"paged":1,"class":"jblog_block_13"};
Should the flagged firms fail to attain full license status, it will challenge Hong Kong's attempts to become a crypto hub. Although many crypto exchanges have received initial approvals to operate in the region, they have yet to earn full licenses.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Hong Kong criminalized crypto firms operating unlicensed virtual asset trading platforms on June 1. SFC said it would pursue firms violating the regulation.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n HashKey and OSL are the only firms with full licenses in Hong Kong, while OKX and ByBit are among 12 firms that have withdrawn their applications following SFC inspections.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Hong Kong Regulator Flags Up To 11 Crypto Firms Seeking A Full Licence","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"hong-kong-regulator-flags-up-to-11-crypto-firms-seeking-a-full-licence","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-28 23:32:21","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-28 13:32:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18388","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":18361,"post_author":"1","post_date":"2024-08-26 00:58:52","post_date_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:52","post_content":"\n A recent ruling by the Federal Court of Australia has brought to light significant compliance issues surrounding Kraken's operations in the country, Coindesk reported. Bit Trade Pty Ltd, Kraken's local operator, was found to have violated Australian financial regulations by offering a margin extension product to retail clients without conducting a required target market determination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This ruling<\/a>, which marks a notable victory for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), underscores the growing scrutiny faced by cryptocurrency exchanges in the country. Justice Nicholas determined that Bit Trade breached Section 994B of the Corporations Act, which mandates that financial product issuers must assess and define the target market for their offerings before they reach consumers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to ASIC, Bit Trade's margin extension product has been available on the Kraken exchange since October 2021 without the legally required target market determination. The court found that this oversight placed Bit Trade in direct contravention of the Corporations Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Kraken Exchange Opens Waitlist For An Upcoming NFT Platform<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Justice Nicholas clarified that while the repayment of a digital asset does not constitute a deferred debt, the extension of margin in national currency does, thereby categorizing the product as a credit facility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In response to the ruling, a Kraken spokesperson expressed disappointment but emphasized the company's commitment to compliance. \"We're prepared and willing to comply with the court's decision,\"<\/em> the spokesperson said. They also highlighted the complexity of applying traditional regulatory frameworks to emerging technologies, acknowledging the court's recognition of these challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Following the ruling, ASIC announced that the two parties had seven days to agree on declarations and injunctions. Additionally, ASIC intends to seek financial penalties against Bit Trade, further highlighting the regulatory challenges that global crypto firms face as they navigate differing legal landscapes.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Kraken's Australian Arm Found In Breach Of Financial Regulations, Court Rules","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"krakens-australian-arm-found-in-breach-of-financial-regulations-court-rules","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-26 00:58:58","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18361","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"total_page":false},"paged":1,"class":"jblog_block_13"};
Should the flagged firms fail to attain full license status, it will challenge Hong Kong's attempts to become a crypto hub. Although many crypto exchanges have received initial approvals to operate in the region, they have yet to earn full licenses.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Hong Kong criminalized crypto firms operating unlicensed virtual asset trading platforms on June 1. SFC said it would pursue firms violating the regulation.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n HashKey and OSL are the only firms with full licenses in Hong Kong, while OKX and ByBit are among 12 firms that have withdrawn their applications following SFC inspections.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Hong Kong Regulator Flags Up To 11 Crypto Firms Seeking A Full Licence","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"hong-kong-regulator-flags-up-to-11-crypto-firms-seeking-a-full-licence","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-28 23:32:21","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-28 13:32:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18388","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":18361,"post_author":"1","post_date":"2024-08-26 00:58:52","post_date_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:52","post_content":"\n A recent ruling by the Federal Court of Australia has brought to light significant compliance issues surrounding Kraken's operations in the country, Coindesk reported. Bit Trade Pty Ltd, Kraken's local operator, was found to have violated Australian financial regulations by offering a margin extension product to retail clients without conducting a required target market determination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This ruling<\/a>, which marks a notable victory for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), underscores the growing scrutiny faced by cryptocurrency exchanges in the country. Justice Nicholas determined that Bit Trade breached Section 994B of the Corporations Act, which mandates that financial product issuers must assess and define the target market for their offerings before they reach consumers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to ASIC, Bit Trade's margin extension product has been available on the Kraken exchange since October 2021 without the legally required target market determination. The court found that this oversight placed Bit Trade in direct contravention of the Corporations Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Kraken Exchange Opens Waitlist For An Upcoming NFT Platform<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Justice Nicholas clarified that while the repayment of a digital asset does not constitute a deferred debt, the extension of margin in national currency does, thereby categorizing the product as a credit facility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In response to the ruling, a Kraken spokesperson expressed disappointment but emphasized the company's commitment to compliance. \"We're prepared and willing to comply with the court's decision,\"<\/em> the spokesperson said. They also highlighted the complexity of applying traditional regulatory frameworks to emerging technologies, acknowledging the court's recognition of these challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Following the ruling, ASIC announced that the two parties had seven days to agree on declarations and injunctions. Additionally, ASIC intends to seek financial penalties against Bit Trade, further highlighting the regulatory challenges that global crypto firms face as they navigate differing legal landscapes.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Kraken's Australian Arm Found In Breach Of Financial Regulations, Court Rules","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"krakens-australian-arm-found-in-breach-of-financial-regulations-court-rules","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-26 00:58:58","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18361","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"total_page":false},"paged":1,"class":"jblog_block_13"};
See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Hong Kong\u2019s Regulator Receives The Initial Filing For The First Spot Bitcoin ETF<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Should the flagged firms fail to attain full license status, it will challenge Hong Kong's attempts to become a crypto hub. Although many crypto exchanges have received initial approvals to operate in the region, they have yet to earn full licenses.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Hong Kong criminalized crypto firms operating unlicensed virtual asset trading platforms on June 1. SFC said it would pursue firms violating the regulation.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n HashKey and OSL are the only firms with full licenses in Hong Kong, while OKX and ByBit are among 12 firms that have withdrawn their applications following SFC inspections.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Hong Kong Regulator Flags Up To 11 Crypto Firms Seeking A Full Licence","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"hong-kong-regulator-flags-up-to-11-crypto-firms-seeking-a-full-licence","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-28 23:32:21","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-28 13:32:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18388","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":18361,"post_author":"1","post_date":"2024-08-26 00:58:52","post_date_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:52","post_content":"\n A recent ruling by the Federal Court of Australia has brought to light significant compliance issues surrounding Kraken's operations in the country, Coindesk reported. Bit Trade Pty Ltd, Kraken's local operator, was found to have violated Australian financial regulations by offering a margin extension product to retail clients without conducting a required target market determination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This ruling<\/a>, which marks a notable victory for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), underscores the growing scrutiny faced by cryptocurrency exchanges in the country. Justice Nicholas determined that Bit Trade breached Section 994B of the Corporations Act, which mandates that financial product issuers must assess and define the target market for their offerings before they reach consumers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to ASIC, Bit Trade's margin extension product has been available on the Kraken exchange since October 2021 without the legally required target market determination. The court found that this oversight placed Bit Trade in direct contravention of the Corporations Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Kraken Exchange Opens Waitlist For An Upcoming NFT Platform<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Justice Nicholas clarified that while the repayment of a digital asset does not constitute a deferred debt, the extension of margin in national currency does, thereby categorizing the product as a credit facility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In response to the ruling, a Kraken spokesperson expressed disappointment but emphasized the company's commitment to compliance. \"We're prepared and willing to comply with the court's decision,\"<\/em> the spokesperson said. They also highlighted the complexity of applying traditional regulatory frameworks to emerging technologies, acknowledging the court's recognition of these challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Following the ruling, ASIC announced that the two parties had seven days to agree on declarations and injunctions. Additionally, ASIC intends to seek financial penalties against Bit Trade, further highlighting the regulatory challenges that global crypto firms face as they navigate differing legal landscapes.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Kraken's Australian Arm Found In Breach Of Financial Regulations, Court Rules","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"krakens-australian-arm-found-in-breach-of-financial-regulations-court-rules","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-26 00:58:58","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18361","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"total_page":false},"paged":1,"class":"jblog_block_13"};
It is not clear which crypto entities have been flagged for \"critical deficiencies.\" However, exchanges such as Crypto.com, PantherTrade, HKbitEX, and Bullish had applied for a full license.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Hong Kong\u2019s Regulator Receives The Initial Filing For The First Spot Bitcoin ETF<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Should the flagged firms fail to attain full license status, it will challenge Hong Kong's attempts to become a crypto hub. Although many crypto exchanges have received initial approvals to operate in the region, they have yet to earn full licenses.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Hong Kong criminalized crypto firms operating unlicensed virtual asset trading platforms on June 1. SFC said it would pursue firms violating the regulation.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n HashKey and OSL are the only firms with full licenses in Hong Kong, while OKX and ByBit are among 12 firms that have withdrawn their applications following SFC inspections.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Hong Kong Regulator Flags Up To 11 Crypto Firms Seeking A Full Licence","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"hong-kong-regulator-flags-up-to-11-crypto-firms-seeking-a-full-licence","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-28 23:32:21","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-28 13:32:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18388","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":18361,"post_author":"1","post_date":"2024-08-26 00:58:52","post_date_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:52","post_content":"\n A recent ruling by the Federal Court of Australia has brought to light significant compliance issues surrounding Kraken's operations in the country, Coindesk reported. Bit Trade Pty Ltd, Kraken's local operator, was found to have violated Australian financial regulations by offering a margin extension product to retail clients without conducting a required target market determination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This ruling<\/a>, which marks a notable victory for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), underscores the growing scrutiny faced by cryptocurrency exchanges in the country. Justice Nicholas determined that Bit Trade breached Section 994B of the Corporations Act, which mandates that financial product issuers must assess and define the target market for their offerings before they reach consumers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to ASIC, Bit Trade's margin extension product has been available on the Kraken exchange since October 2021 without the legally required target market determination. The court found that this oversight placed Bit Trade in direct contravention of the Corporations Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Kraken Exchange Opens Waitlist For An Upcoming NFT Platform<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Justice Nicholas clarified that while the repayment of a digital asset does not constitute a deferred debt, the extension of margin in national currency does, thereby categorizing the product as a credit facility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In response to the ruling, a Kraken spokesperson expressed disappointment but emphasized the company's commitment to compliance. \"We're prepared and willing to comply with the court's decision,\"<\/em> the spokesperson said. They also highlighted the complexity of applying traditional regulatory frameworks to emerging technologies, acknowledging the court's recognition of these challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Following the ruling, ASIC announced that the two parties had seven days to agree on declarations and injunctions. Additionally, ASIC intends to seek financial penalties against Bit Trade, further highlighting the regulatory challenges that global crypto firms face as they navigate differing legal landscapes.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Kraken's Australian Arm Found In Breach Of Financial Regulations, Court Rules","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"krakens-australian-arm-found-in-breach-of-financial-regulations-court-rules","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-26 00:58:58","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18361","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"total_page":false},"paged":1,"class":"jblog_block_13"};
A spokesperson of SFC says the inspections are still ongoing and subject to change. Crypto firms that are unable to address the deficiencies discovered during on-site inspections may see their deemed license status revoked or their licenses declined.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is not clear which crypto entities have been flagged for \"critical deficiencies.\" However, exchanges such as Crypto.com, PantherTrade, HKbitEX, and Bullish had applied for a full license.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Hong Kong\u2019s Regulator Receives The Initial Filing For The First Spot Bitcoin ETF<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Should the flagged firms fail to attain full license status, it will challenge Hong Kong's attempts to become a crypto hub. Although many crypto exchanges have received initial approvals to operate in the region, they have yet to earn full licenses.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Hong Kong criminalized crypto firms operating unlicensed virtual asset trading platforms on June 1. SFC said it would pursue firms violating the regulation.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n HashKey and OSL are the only firms with full licenses in Hong Kong, while OKX and ByBit are among 12 firms that have withdrawn their applications following SFC inspections.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Hong Kong Regulator Flags Up To 11 Crypto Firms Seeking A Full Licence","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"hong-kong-regulator-flags-up-to-11-crypto-firms-seeking-a-full-licence","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-28 23:32:21","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-28 13:32:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18388","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":18361,"post_author":"1","post_date":"2024-08-26 00:58:52","post_date_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:52","post_content":"\n A recent ruling by the Federal Court of Australia has brought to light significant compliance issues surrounding Kraken's operations in the country, Coindesk reported. Bit Trade Pty Ltd, Kraken's local operator, was found to have violated Australian financial regulations by offering a margin extension product to retail clients without conducting a required target market determination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This ruling<\/a>, which marks a notable victory for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), underscores the growing scrutiny faced by cryptocurrency exchanges in the country. Justice Nicholas determined that Bit Trade breached Section 994B of the Corporations Act, which mandates that financial product issuers must assess and define the target market for their offerings before they reach consumers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to ASIC, Bit Trade's margin extension product has been available on the Kraken exchange since October 2021 without the legally required target market determination. The court found that this oversight placed Bit Trade in direct contravention of the Corporations Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Kraken Exchange Opens Waitlist For An Upcoming NFT Platform<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Justice Nicholas clarified that while the repayment of a digital asset does not constitute a deferred debt, the extension of margin in national currency does, thereby categorizing the product as a credit facility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In response to the ruling, a Kraken spokesperson expressed disappointment but emphasized the company's commitment to compliance. \"We're prepared and willing to comply with the court's decision,\"<\/em> the spokesperson said. They also highlighted the complexity of applying traditional regulatory frameworks to emerging technologies, acknowledging the court's recognition of these challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Following the ruling, ASIC announced that the two parties had seven days to agree on declarations and injunctions. Additionally, ASIC intends to seek financial penalties against Bit Trade, further highlighting the regulatory challenges that global crypto firms face as they navigate differing legal landscapes.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Kraken's Australian Arm Found In Breach Of Financial Regulations, Court Rules","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"krakens-australian-arm-found-in-breach-of-financial-regulations-court-rules","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-26 00:58:58","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18361","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"total_page":false},"paged":1,"class":"jblog_block_13"};
\"Some of the crypto firms are overly reliant on a handful of executives to oversee the custody of client assets, while others aren\u2019t properly guarding against cybercrime risks.\"<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson of SFC says the inspections are still ongoing and subject to change. Crypto firms that are unable to address the deficiencies discovered during on-site inspections may see their deemed license status revoked or their licenses declined.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is not clear which crypto entities have been flagged for \"critical deficiencies.\" However, exchanges such as Crypto.com, PantherTrade, HKbitEX, and Bullish had applied for a full license.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Hong Kong\u2019s Regulator Receives The Initial Filing For The First Spot Bitcoin ETF<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Should the flagged firms fail to attain full license status, it will challenge Hong Kong's attempts to become a crypto hub. Although many crypto exchanges have received initial approvals to operate in the region, they have yet to earn full licenses.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Hong Kong criminalized crypto firms operating unlicensed virtual asset trading platforms on June 1. SFC said it would pursue firms violating the regulation.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n HashKey and OSL are the only firms with full licenses in Hong Kong, while OKX and ByBit are among 12 firms that have withdrawn their applications following SFC inspections.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Hong Kong Regulator Flags Up To 11 Crypto Firms Seeking A Full Licence","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"hong-kong-regulator-flags-up-to-11-crypto-firms-seeking-a-full-licence","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-28 23:32:21","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-28 13:32:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18388","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":18361,"post_author":"1","post_date":"2024-08-26 00:58:52","post_date_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:52","post_content":"\n A recent ruling by the Federal Court of Australia has brought to light significant compliance issues surrounding Kraken's operations in the country, Coindesk reported. Bit Trade Pty Ltd, Kraken's local operator, was found to have violated Australian financial regulations by offering a margin extension product to retail clients without conducting a required target market determination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This ruling<\/a>, which marks a notable victory for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), underscores the growing scrutiny faced by cryptocurrency exchanges in the country. Justice Nicholas determined that Bit Trade breached Section 994B of the Corporations Act, which mandates that financial product issuers must assess and define the target market for their offerings before they reach consumers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to ASIC, Bit Trade's margin extension product has been available on the Kraken exchange since October 2021 without the legally required target market determination. The court found that this oversight placed Bit Trade in direct contravention of the Corporations Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Kraken Exchange Opens Waitlist For An Upcoming NFT Platform<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Justice Nicholas clarified that while the repayment of a digital asset does not constitute a deferred debt, the extension of margin in national currency does, thereby categorizing the product as a credit facility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In response to the ruling, a Kraken spokesperson expressed disappointment but emphasized the company's commitment to compliance. \"We're prepared and willing to comply with the court's decision,\"<\/em> the spokesperson said. They also highlighted the complexity of applying traditional regulatory frameworks to emerging technologies, acknowledging the court's recognition of these challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Following the ruling, ASIC announced that the two parties had seven days to agree on declarations and injunctions. Additionally, ASIC intends to seek financial penalties against Bit Trade, further highlighting the regulatory challenges that global crypto firms face as they navigate differing legal landscapes.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Kraken's Australian Arm Found In Breach Of Financial Regulations, Court Rules","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"krakens-australian-arm-found-in-breach-of-financial-regulations-court-rules","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-26 00:58:58","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18361","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"total_page":false},"paged":1,"class":"jblog_block_13"};
Hong Kong\u2019s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has reportedly<\/a> found \u201cunsatisfactory practices\u201d on up to 11 crypto exchanges seeking a full license. On-site inspections by the regulator found some firms with weak controls on cyber risks and client assets custody. The report states:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \"Some of the crypto firms are overly reliant on a handful of executives to oversee the custody of client assets, while others aren\u2019t properly guarding against cybercrime risks.\"<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson of SFC says the inspections are still ongoing and subject to change. Crypto firms that are unable to address the deficiencies discovered during on-site inspections may see their deemed license status revoked or their licenses declined.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is not clear which crypto entities have been flagged for \"critical deficiencies.\" However, exchanges such as Crypto.com, PantherTrade, HKbitEX, and Bullish had applied for a full license.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Hong Kong\u2019s Regulator Receives The Initial Filing For The First Spot Bitcoin ETF<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Should the flagged firms fail to attain full license status, it will challenge Hong Kong's attempts to become a crypto hub. Although many crypto exchanges have received initial approvals to operate in the region, they have yet to earn full licenses.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Hong Kong criminalized crypto firms operating unlicensed virtual asset trading platforms on June 1. SFC said it would pursue firms violating the regulation.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n HashKey and OSL are the only firms with full licenses in Hong Kong, while OKX and ByBit are among 12 firms that have withdrawn their applications following SFC inspections.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Hong Kong Regulator Flags Up To 11 Crypto Firms Seeking A Full Licence","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"hong-kong-regulator-flags-up-to-11-crypto-firms-seeking-a-full-licence","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-28 23:32:21","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-28 13:32:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18388","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":18361,"post_author":"1","post_date":"2024-08-26 00:58:52","post_date_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:52","post_content":"\n A recent ruling by the Federal Court of Australia has brought to light significant compliance issues surrounding Kraken's operations in the country, Coindesk reported. Bit Trade Pty Ltd, Kraken's local operator, was found to have violated Australian financial regulations by offering a margin extension product to retail clients without conducting a required target market determination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This ruling<\/a>, which marks a notable victory for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), underscores the growing scrutiny faced by cryptocurrency exchanges in the country. Justice Nicholas determined that Bit Trade breached Section 994B of the Corporations Act, which mandates that financial product issuers must assess and define the target market for their offerings before they reach consumers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to ASIC, Bit Trade's margin extension product has been available on the Kraken exchange since October 2021 without the legally required target market determination. The court found that this oversight placed Bit Trade in direct contravention of the Corporations Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Kraken Exchange Opens Waitlist For An Upcoming NFT Platform<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Justice Nicholas clarified that while the repayment of a digital asset does not constitute a deferred debt, the extension of margin in national currency does, thereby categorizing the product as a credit facility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In response to the ruling, a Kraken spokesperson expressed disappointment but emphasized the company's commitment to compliance. \"We're prepared and willing to comply with the court's decision,\"<\/em> the spokesperson said. They also highlighted the complexity of applying traditional regulatory frameworks to emerging technologies, acknowledging the court's recognition of these challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Following the ruling, ASIC announced that the two parties had seven days to agree on declarations and injunctions. Additionally, ASIC intends to seek financial penalties against Bit Trade, further highlighting the regulatory challenges that global crypto firms face as they navigate differing legal landscapes.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Kraken's Australian Arm Found In Breach Of Financial Regulations, Court Rules","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"krakens-australian-arm-found-in-breach-of-financial-regulations-court-rules","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-26 00:58:58","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18361","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"total_page":false},"paged":1,"class":"jblog_block_13"};
Hong Kong\u2019s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has reportedly<\/a> found \u201cunsatisfactory practices\u201d on up to 11 crypto exchanges seeking a full license. On-site inspections by the regulator found some firms with weak controls on cyber risks and client assets custody. The report states:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \"Some of the crypto firms are overly reliant on a handful of executives to oversee the custody of client assets, while others aren\u2019t properly guarding against cybercrime risks.\"<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson of SFC says the inspections are still ongoing and subject to change. Crypto firms that are unable to address the deficiencies discovered during on-site inspections may see their deemed license status revoked or their licenses declined.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is not clear which crypto entities have been flagged for \"critical deficiencies.\" However, exchanges such as Crypto.com, PantherTrade, HKbitEX, and Bullish had applied for a full license.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Hong Kong\u2019s Regulator Receives The Initial Filing For The First Spot Bitcoin ETF<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Should the flagged firms fail to attain full license status, it will challenge Hong Kong's attempts to become a crypto hub. Although many crypto exchanges have received initial approvals to operate in the region, they have yet to earn full licenses.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Hong Kong criminalized crypto firms operating unlicensed virtual asset trading platforms on June 1. SFC said it would pursue firms violating the regulation.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n HashKey and OSL are the only firms with full licenses in Hong Kong, while OKX and ByBit are among 12 firms that have withdrawn their applications following SFC inspections.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Hong Kong Regulator Flags Up To 11 Crypto Firms Seeking A Full Licence","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"hong-kong-regulator-flags-up-to-11-crypto-firms-seeking-a-full-licence","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-28 23:32:21","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-28 13:32:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18388","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":18361,"post_author":"1","post_date":"2024-08-26 00:58:52","post_date_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:52","post_content":"\n A recent ruling by the Federal Court of Australia has brought to light significant compliance issues surrounding Kraken's operations in the country, Coindesk reported. Bit Trade Pty Ltd, Kraken's local operator, was found to have violated Australian financial regulations by offering a margin extension product to retail clients without conducting a required target market determination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This ruling<\/a>, which marks a notable victory for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), underscores the growing scrutiny faced by cryptocurrency exchanges in the country. Justice Nicholas determined that Bit Trade breached Section 994B of the Corporations Act, which mandates that financial product issuers must assess and define the target market for their offerings before they reach consumers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to ASIC, Bit Trade's margin extension product has been available on the Kraken exchange since October 2021 without the legally required target market determination. The court found that this oversight placed Bit Trade in direct contravention of the Corporations Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Kraken Exchange Opens Waitlist For An Upcoming NFT Platform<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Justice Nicholas clarified that while the repayment of a digital asset does not constitute a deferred debt, the extension of margin in national currency does, thereby categorizing the product as a credit facility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In response to the ruling, a Kraken spokesperson expressed disappointment but emphasized the company's commitment to compliance. \"We're prepared and willing to comply with the court's decision,\"<\/em> the spokesperson said. They also highlighted the complexity of applying traditional regulatory frameworks to emerging technologies, acknowledging the court's recognition of these challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Following the ruling, ASIC announced that the two parties had seven days to agree on declarations and injunctions. Additionally, ASIC intends to seek financial penalties against Bit Trade, further highlighting the regulatory challenges that global crypto firms face as they navigate differing legal landscapes.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Kraken's Australian Arm Found In Breach Of Financial Regulations, Court Rules","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"krakens-australian-arm-found-in-breach-of-financial-regulations-court-rules","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-26 00:58:58","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18361","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"total_page":false},"paged":1,"class":"jblog_block_13"};
Hong Kong\u2019s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has reportedly<\/a> found \u201cunsatisfactory practices\u201d on up to 11 crypto exchanges seeking a full license. On-site inspections by the regulator found some firms with weak controls on cyber risks and client assets custody. The report states:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \"Some of the crypto firms are overly reliant on a handful of executives to oversee the custody of client assets, while others aren\u2019t properly guarding against cybercrime risks.\"<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson of SFC says the inspections are still ongoing and subject to change. Crypto firms that are unable to address the deficiencies discovered during on-site inspections may see their deemed license status revoked or their licenses declined.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is not clear which crypto entities have been flagged for \"critical deficiencies.\" However, exchanges such as Crypto.com, PantherTrade, HKbitEX, and Bullish had applied for a full license.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Hong Kong\u2019s Regulator Receives The Initial Filing For The First Spot Bitcoin ETF<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Should the flagged firms fail to attain full license status, it will challenge Hong Kong's attempts to become a crypto hub. Although many crypto exchanges have received initial approvals to operate in the region, they have yet to earn full licenses.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Hong Kong criminalized crypto firms operating unlicensed virtual asset trading platforms on June 1. SFC said it would pursue firms violating the regulation.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n HashKey and OSL are the only firms with full licenses in Hong Kong, while OKX and ByBit are among 12 firms that have withdrawn their applications following SFC inspections.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Hong Kong Regulator Flags Up To 11 Crypto Firms Seeking A Full Licence","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"hong-kong-regulator-flags-up-to-11-crypto-firms-seeking-a-full-licence","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-28 23:32:21","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-28 13:32:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18388","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":18361,"post_author":"1","post_date":"2024-08-26 00:58:52","post_date_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:52","post_content":"\n A recent ruling by the Federal Court of Australia has brought to light significant compliance issues surrounding Kraken's operations in the country, Coindesk reported. Bit Trade Pty Ltd, Kraken's local operator, was found to have violated Australian financial regulations by offering a margin extension product to retail clients without conducting a required target market determination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This ruling<\/a>, which marks a notable victory for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), underscores the growing scrutiny faced by cryptocurrency exchanges in the country. Justice Nicholas determined that Bit Trade breached Section 994B of the Corporations Act, which mandates that financial product issuers must assess and define the target market for their offerings before they reach consumers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to ASIC, Bit Trade's margin extension product has been available on the Kraken exchange since October 2021 without the legally required target market determination. The court found that this oversight placed Bit Trade in direct contravention of the Corporations Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Kraken Exchange Opens Waitlist For An Upcoming NFT Platform<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Justice Nicholas clarified that while the repayment of a digital asset does not constitute a deferred debt, the extension of margin in national currency does, thereby categorizing the product as a credit facility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In response to the ruling, a Kraken spokesperson expressed disappointment but emphasized the company's commitment to compliance. \"We're prepared and willing to comply with the court's decision,\"<\/em> the spokesperson said. They also highlighted the complexity of applying traditional regulatory frameworks to emerging technologies, acknowledging the court's recognition of these challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Following the ruling, ASIC announced that the two parties had seven days to agree on declarations and injunctions. Additionally, ASIC intends to seek financial penalties against Bit Trade, further highlighting the regulatory challenges that global crypto firms face as they navigate differing legal landscapes.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Kraken's Australian Arm Found In Breach Of Financial Regulations, Court Rules","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"krakens-australian-arm-found-in-breach-of-financial-regulations-court-rules","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-26 00:58:58","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18361","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"total_page":false},"paged":1,"class":"jblog_block_13"};
Hong Kong\u2019s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has reportedly<\/a> found \u201cunsatisfactory practices\u201d on up to 11 crypto exchanges seeking a full license. On-site inspections by the regulator found some firms with weak controls on cyber risks and client assets custody. The report states:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \"Some of the crypto firms are overly reliant on a handful of executives to oversee the custody of client assets, while others aren\u2019t properly guarding against cybercrime risks.\"<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson of SFC says the inspections are still ongoing and subject to change. Crypto firms that are unable to address the deficiencies discovered during on-site inspections may see their deemed license status revoked or their licenses declined.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is not clear which crypto entities have been flagged for \"critical deficiencies.\" However, exchanges such as Crypto.com, PantherTrade, HKbitEX, and Bullish had applied for a full license.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Hong Kong\u2019s Regulator Receives The Initial Filing For The First Spot Bitcoin ETF<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Should the flagged firms fail to attain full license status, it will challenge Hong Kong's attempts to become a crypto hub. Although many crypto exchanges have received initial approvals to operate in the region, they have yet to earn full licenses.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Hong Kong criminalized crypto firms operating unlicensed virtual asset trading platforms on June 1. SFC said it would pursue firms violating the regulation.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n HashKey and OSL are the only firms with full licenses in Hong Kong, while OKX and ByBit are among 12 firms that have withdrawn their applications following SFC inspections.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Hong Kong Regulator Flags Up To 11 Crypto Firms Seeking A Full Licence","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"hong-kong-regulator-flags-up-to-11-crypto-firms-seeking-a-full-licence","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-28 23:32:21","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-28 13:32:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18388","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":18361,"post_author":"1","post_date":"2024-08-26 00:58:52","post_date_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:52","post_content":"\n A recent ruling by the Federal Court of Australia has brought to light significant compliance issues surrounding Kraken's operations in the country, Coindesk reported. Bit Trade Pty Ltd, Kraken's local operator, was found to have violated Australian financial regulations by offering a margin extension product to retail clients without conducting a required target market determination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This ruling<\/a>, which marks a notable victory for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), underscores the growing scrutiny faced by cryptocurrency exchanges in the country. Justice Nicholas determined that Bit Trade breached Section 994B of the Corporations Act, which mandates that financial product issuers must assess and define the target market for their offerings before they reach consumers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to ASIC, Bit Trade's margin extension product has been available on the Kraken exchange since October 2021 without the legally required target market determination. The court found that this oversight placed Bit Trade in direct contravention of the Corporations Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Kraken Exchange Opens Waitlist For An Upcoming NFT Platform<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Justice Nicholas clarified that while the repayment of a digital asset does not constitute a deferred debt, the extension of margin in national currency does, thereby categorizing the product as a credit facility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In response to the ruling, a Kraken spokesperson expressed disappointment but emphasized the company's commitment to compliance. \"We're prepared and willing to comply with the court's decision,\"<\/em> the spokesperson said. They also highlighted the complexity of applying traditional regulatory frameworks to emerging technologies, acknowledging the court's recognition of these challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Following the ruling, ASIC announced that the two parties had seven days to agree on declarations and injunctions. Additionally, ASIC intends to seek financial penalties against Bit Trade, further highlighting the regulatory challenges that global crypto firms face as they navigate differing legal landscapes.<\/p>\n","post_title":"Kraken's Australian Arm Found In Breach Of Financial Regulations, Court Rules","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"krakens-australian-arm-found-in-breach-of-financial-regulations-court-rules","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-26 00:58:58","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:58","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18361","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"total_page":false},"paged":1,"class":"jblog_block_13"};
<\/p>\n","post_title":"Fed Unveils New Capital Requirements For Big Banks, Eases Pressure On Goldman Sachs","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"fed-unveils-new-capital-requirements-for-big-banks-eases-pressure-on-goldman-sachs","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-31 18:25:34","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-31 08:25:34","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18432","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":18388,"post_author":"21","post_date":"2024-08-28 23:32:17","post_date_gmt":"2024-08-28 13:32:17","post_content":"\n Hong Kong\u2019s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has reportedly<\/a> found \u201cunsatisfactory practices\u201d on up to 11 crypto exchanges seeking a full license. On-site inspections by the regulator found some firms with weak controls on cyber risks and client assets custody. The report states:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \"Some of the crypto firms are overly reliant on a handful of executives to oversee the custody of client assets, while others aren\u2019t properly guarding against cybercrime risks.\"<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson of SFC says the inspections are still ongoing and subject to change. Crypto firms that are unable to address the deficiencies discovered during on-site inspections may see their deemed license status revoked or their licenses declined.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is not clear which crypto entities have been flagged for \"critical deficiencies.\" However, exchanges such as Crypto.com, PantherTrade, HKbitEX, and Bullish had applied for a full license.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See Related: <\/em><\/strong>Hong Kong\u2019s Regulator Receives The Initial Filing For The First Spot Bitcoin ETF<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Should the flagged firms fail to attain full license status, it will challenge Hong Kong's attempts to become a crypto hub. Although many crypto exchanges have received initial approvals to operate in the region, they have yet to earn full licenses.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Hong Kong criminalized crypto firms operating unlicensed virtual asset trading platforms on June 1. SFC said it would pursue firms violating the regulation.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n HashKey and OSL are the only firms with full licenses in Hong Kong, while OKX and ByBit are among 12 firms that have withdrawn their applications following SFC inspections.\u00a0<\/p>\n","post_title":"Hong Kong Regulator Flags Up To 11 Crypto Firms Seeking A Full Licence","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"hong-kong-regulator-flags-up-to-11-crypto-firms-seeking-a-full-licence","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2024-08-28 23:32:21","post_modified_gmt":"2024-08-28 13:32:21","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.thedistributed.co\/?p=18388","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":18361,"post_author":"1","post_date":"2024-08-26 00:58:52","post_date_gmt":"2024-08-25 14:58:52","post_content":"\n A recent ruling by the Federal Court of Australia has brought to light significant compliance issues surrounding Kraken's operations in the country, Coindesk reported. Bit Trade Pty Ltd, Kraken's local operator, was found to have violated Australian financial regulations by offering a margin extension product to retail clients without conducting a required target market determination.<\/p>\n\n\n\nBit Trade's Breach And ASIC's Case<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Bit Trade's Breach And ASIC's Case<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Bit Trade's Breach And ASIC's Case<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Bit Trade's Breach And ASIC's Case<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Bit Trade's Breach And ASIC's Case<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Bit Trade's Breach And ASIC's Case<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Bit Trade's Breach And ASIC's Case<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
Bit Trade's Breach And ASIC's Case<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
Bit Trade's Breach And ASIC's Case<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
Bit Trade's Breach And ASIC's Case<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
Bit Trade's Breach And ASIC's Case<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Flagged Firms And Full License Status<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
Bit Trade's Breach And ASIC's Case<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Flagged Firms And Full License Status<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
Bit Trade's Breach And ASIC's Case<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Flagged Firms And Full License Status<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
Bit Trade's Breach And ASIC's Case<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Flagged Firms And Full License Status<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
Bit Trade's Breach And ASIC's Case<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Flagged Firms And Full License Status<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
Bit Trade's Breach And ASIC's Case<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Flagged Firms And Full License Status<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
Bit Trade's Breach And ASIC's Case<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Flagged Firms And Full License Status<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
Bit Trade's Breach And ASIC's Case<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Flagged Firms And Full License Status<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
Bit Trade's Breach And ASIC's Case<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
Flagged Firms And Full License Status<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
Bit Trade's Breach And ASIC's Case<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
Flagged Firms And Full License Status<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n