- Stablecoin licensing will follow a strict approval criterion as authorities take a cautious approach to market entry.
- Officials believe Hong Kong’s balanced oversight model could shape stablecoin regulation across the region.
Hong Kong is set to begin issuing its first stablecoin issuer licenses in March, though regulators say approvals will be highly selective at the start, a report reveals.
Eddie Yue Wai-man, chief executive of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), told lawmakers that the licensing review process is almost complete. He, however, added that only a “small number” of applications is expected to succeed initially.
HKMA’s evaluation will prioritize strong risk management frameworks, robust anti-money-laundering controls, and transparency of assets backing the stablecoin. Licensed issuers will also be required to comply with Hong Kong’s rules on cross-border activities, with the possibility of future mutual recognition agreements with other jurisdictions.
Hong Kong’s initiative comes as stablecoins gain global traction, having processed an estimated $35 trillion in transactions last year. While currently valued at about $300 billion, major banks project the sector could grow into a multi-trillion-dollar market, potentially reshaping digital trade and settlement worldwide.
See Related: Russia’s Second-Largest Bank To Open Spot Crypto Trading To Rich Clients
How Hong Kong’s Stablecoin Rules Compare With Other Major Crypto Hubs
Hong Kong prioritizes rigorous licensing, reserves transparency, and AML/KYC controls, which set it apart from other major crypto hubs. HKMA officials stress a high bar for approvals, with limited issuers expected, a stance that reflects concerns about financial stability and investor protection.
Robert Lui Chi-wang, Hong Kong’s digital asset leader, shared that this Hong Kong model could become a regional benchmark, blending innovation with strong oversight. This cautious approach contrasts with Singapore’s faster, sandbox-led licensing and the EU’s broad MiCA framework, which has been criticized for complexity and compliance burdens.